• Author:
  • Published: Apr 5th, 2012

qumu # 4 2012 | May 25
When There Are No Common Words:
Using visual material in research on the racialization of place

This qumu seminar takes place 25 May 10.15-12.00 in Ansvaret and features Ulrika Schmauch, senior lecturer at the department of Sociology, Umeå University and Katarina Giritli-Nygren, senior lecturer at the department of Social Sciences, MidSweden University. Ulrika and Katarina will present results from the research project “Mitt Sundsvall”, focused on understanding the hidden boundaries in the town of Sundsvall in relation to ethnic relationships taking place in everyday settings such as the neigbourhood, the town square and the public library. The project was conducted in collaboration with students of the SFI in Sundsvall (Svenska För Invandrare/Swedish For Immigrants). In relation to the project they will argue that while research is always crisscrossed by relationships of power, the usage of different kinds of visual material tends to make available other kinds of stories than more traditional forms of qualitative data. Also, they will argue that visual material is especially useful in research settings where researcher and researched do not have access to a common language as it tends to destabilize the preferred readings of the researchers and thus making participants influence over the research stronger.

  • Author:
  • Published: Jan 30th, 2012

qumu # 2 2012 | February 28
Studying Social Media:
Methodological and Ethical Challenges

Our next qumu seminar takes place 28 February 13.15-15.00 in Ansvaret and features Anders Larsson, PhD candidate (since 2008) and junior lecturer (since 2004) at the department of Informatics and Media, Uppsala university. The title of the talk is “Studying Social Media: Methodological and Ethical Challenges”.

Emerging online arenas offer new possibilities for the study of online public communication aided by computer-assisted methods of data collection. However, these possibilities also entail challenges. During my talk, I will deal with two sets of such challenges. Firstly, the scale of the data available for collection and quantitative analysis challenge our methodological frames as we collect, sort and study large-scale quantitative data sets – often with the use of computer software for visualizations. Researchers need not only to master new tools for data collection, but also be able to critically assess the practices of these new approaches. The second set of challenges concerns ethics, as researchers need to renegotiate the borders between private and public when dealing with data from social media platforms. The methodological issues to be assessed are based on an ongoing research project into the use of Twitter as a micro-blogging service for public debate in the Scandinavian countries. Combining social network analysis of large-scale data sets with a more qualitative approach to user behaviour, the project seeks to grasp the value of tweeting in everyday political talk, as well as in organized political campaigning during recent elections.

  • Author:
  • Published: Jan 11th, 2012

qumu # 1 2012 | January 17
Ethnographic Fieldwork and Asperger

The first qumu seminar of 2012 takes place 17 January 13.15-15.00 in Ansvaret and features Hanna Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, Research Fellow in Gender studies and Sociology. The talk is entitled “Trying to grasp it – producing bodily discourses during an ethnographic fieldwork among people with Asperger Syndrome”.

Hanna will present preliminary results from an ongoing research project aiming at describing and analyzing experiences and representations of Asperger Syndrome (AS) among adults diagnosed with AS in ”Asperger normative” settings (i.e. social environments dominated by people with AS). As part of the study she did three months of ethnographic fieldwork in one such environment; at a postsecondary vocational course for adults diagnosed with AS. The research included on-site participant observation and thematic interviews with students and teaching assistants, individually and in groups.

During the fieldwork, Hanna was trying to learn how to behave so as to fit into the group, and experienced AS in the group as both a verbal and a bodily discourse. During the fieldwork, her subject position was constantly shifting based on social interactions in the group, being either that of an “outsider who is trying to understand” or a “person with Asperger.” During the seminar Hanna will reflect on the different bodily discourses.What kind of research subjectivities were produced or excluded through these discourses?

  • Author:
  • Published: Dec 13th, 2011

qumu # 12 & 13 2011 | December 14-15
Critical Theory and Alternative Media

Leading internet researcher Christian Fuchs, a professor of Media and Communications at Uppsala University, is visiting Umeå University for two days and giving two seminars. These are not pure methods seminars, but are co-presented by qumu, The Department of Culture and Media Studies and HUMlab, and will no doubt be relevant to the qumu field of interest.

 

December 14, 15:15-16:30, C204 Humanities building
The Political Economy of Social Media

The task of this presentation is to analyze the political economy of social media in contemporary capitalism. Prosumption is the convergence of production and consumption of goods and services. First, I discuss the prosumption concept in relation to the approaches of Karl Marx, Alvin Toffler, George Ritzer and Manuel Castells. A critique of Manuel Castells’ “theory” of communication power in the “network society” is presented. Second, the idea of authors like Henry Jenkins or Yochai Benkler that online prosumption (“social media/web”, “web 2.0”) has resulted in a “participatory Internet” or a “participatory culture” is criticized. It is in contrast stressed that in the contemporary situation of global capitalist crisis it is important to remember the socialist origins of the concept of participatory democracy (Crawford Macpherson, Carole Pateman) and of Jürgen Habermas’ concept of the public sphere.

Third, prosumption on the Internet is discussed by analyzing to which extent the following web platforms advance prosumption-oriented participatory democracy and the public sphere or not: Google, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Wikipedia, WikiLeaks.Fourth, it is maintained that in order to understand social relations offline and online in the current turbulent times a renewal of Karl Marx’s theory and of critical political economy is needed. The contributions to class theory by Karl Marx, Rosa Luxemburg, Erik Olin Wright and Michael Hardt/Antonio Negri are discussed. A specific model of class in contemporary capitalist society is used for explaining and criticizing the exploitation of Internet prosumers. Based on the theory tradition of the critical political economy of the media and communication, the concept of Internet prosumer commodification is introduced.Finally, it is maintained that discussing political-economic alternatives is important. Based on Slavoj Žižek’s, David Harvey’s and Alain Badiou’s recent contributions, it is suggested that a commons-based society is needed that acts as framework for a commons-based Internet and thereby allows the democratization of prosumption and communication.

December 15, 13:15-15:00, HUMlab
Critical Theory and Alternative Media/Journalism

 The presentation deals with the category of alternative media from a critical theory perspective. It aims at developing a definition and to distinguish different dimensions of alternative media. I discuss different ways of how scholars have defined alternative media. The notion of alternative media as critical media is introduced. Critical media product content shows suppressed possibilities of existence, antagonisms of reality, potentials for change. It questions domination, expresses the standpoints of oppressed and dominated groups and individuals and argues for the advancement of a co-operative society. Critical media product form aims at advancing imagination, it is dialectical because it involves dynamics, non-identity, rupture, and the unexpected. The category of critical media is connected to Negt’s and Kluge’s notion of the counter public sphere. Critical media can be seen as the communicative dimension of a counter public sphere. I also discuss one specific example from the sphere of online media: WikiLeaks. I deal with the question if WikiLeaks a) is a form of journalism or not and b) can be seen as an alternative medium or not.

 

  • Author:
  • Published: Nov 27th, 2011

qumu # 11 2011 | November 29
Bladerunning, Fightclubbing
and Deerhunting

In his presentation Bladerunning, Fightclubbing and Deerhunting: Why qualitative research fails and how it can succeed again, Jonny Holmström will discuss some major difficulties, pitfalls and problems for qualitative research today. Looking back on the last decade, major developments in qualitative inquiry include the end of the qualitative-quantitative debate; the emergence of diverse and sometimes competing approaches within the qualitative field; and the emergence of sophisticated software to facilitate qualitative analysis.

However, the increasing focus on tools and techniques for qualitative analysis has not been accompanied by a recognition of creativity still being at the center of qualitative analysis. I will argue that we are on a failing course of action as qualitative scholars, and we need to do something about it. Building on ideas from famous movies, I will propose three ways of re-conceptualizing qualitative inquiry. Based on these conceptualizations I will suggest guidelines for the conduct of qualitative inquiry. Jonny Holmström is a professor of Informatics at Umeå University, and has published extensively drawing from various qualitative approaches. His research interests include IT’s organizational consequences, digital innovation, and open innovation methods for university-industry collaboration.

All welcome to Ansvaret at 13.15 on Tuesday 29 November!

 

  • Author:
  • Published: Nov 16th, 2011

qumu #10 2011 | November 17
Historical Futures, Future Histories

17 November 13.15-15.00 in Samvetet

The speaker will be Molly W. Steenson from Princeton University, where she is a PhD candidate in the School of Architecture. She is an architectural historian but also works as a contemporary interaction designer and researcher interested in criticial design and futurecasting.

Molly’s research focuses on the connection of architecture to artificial intelligence in the 1960s and 70s, particularly in the work of Nicholas Negroponte, founder of the MIT Media Lab, and in similar architects who worked with speculative technologies. In this qumu seminar, she will present different approaches from historical and archival research and contemporary work in a discussion of methods around historical futures and future histories.

  • Author:
  • Published: Oct 24th, 2011

qumu #9 2011 | October 26
Analyzing Life Stories as Narratives

Professor Alf Arvidsson will give a qumu seminar (number 9 of this year) on 26 October at 13.15 in Ansvaret. Alf, who is an authority on narratology, will discuss different models for narrative analysis in relation to various research aims. He will also focus on the formats of lifestories and a bit on genre analysis.

The seminar is suitable for anyone working with interview data or any other form of qualitative material where a narrative perspective may be of interest .  All welcome!

 

  • Author:
  • Published: Aug 31st, 2011

qumu #7 & #8 2011 | September 6 and 8
Remix Methods and Fabrications

The first qumu seminar of this semester will be held on Tuesday 6 September, 13.15 to 15.00, in MA466 (MIT building). It will be given by Annette Markham. The title of the seminar is “Remix Culture: Remix Methods”.

Technologies that were once separate and physically located now converge and move with the user to create individualized experiences. Social media and web 2.0 technologies facilitate complex networks of connection among people and across any media form imaginable, disrupting our traditional understandings of producer and consumer, user and object.  Materiality in this mobile epoch is better understood as connection, process, and relationship.

Even within interpretive research frameworks, which are more suited to grapple with process, movement, and relation, the complex and scale of contemporary networks of interaction challenge many taken for granted methods for capturing and analyzing these negotiations.  The complexity of internet-saturated cultural contexts invites and even demands an approach to method that resonates with this complexity. Remix is a term that describes both the process and product of creative re-ensemble of units of cultural information.  Remix is not something we do in addition to our everyday live. It is the way we make sense of our world. By transforming the bombardment of stimuli into a seamless experience. If we take seriously the idea that everything we take to be ‘real’ is a constant negotiation of relationships between people and things, and that culture is ‘habit writ large’, remix as a form of sensemaking embraces this framework.Thinking about qualitative research practice through the framework of remix offers a means of reconfiguring some of the practices associated with qualitative research. A remix approach focuses attention on the creative reflexivity required to manage innumerable sites of meaning in the ‘field’ and transform the chaos of lived experience into reportable ‘findings.’ This talk will address some of the challenges and opportunities of a remix approach to studying social media contexts.

Annette will also give a second seminar (not requiring that you come to the first one) on Thursday 8 September, 13.15 to 15.00 in H2 (HUMlab). That seminar is called “Fabrication and other Creative Ethical Solutions for Internet Research”.

The capacities of the internet have made many things possible in social research but also reveal the weaknesses in many of the traditional methods we have used for qualitative research.  Of particular interest is the way that privacy, as related to the performance of self in online contexts, is conceptualized and protected by researchers. Sociologists as well as journalists have long considered a person’s words to be freely available– if uttered publicly or with permission–to analyze and quote, as long as we anonymize the source. Prior to the internet, researchers for the most part took for granted the ability to store safely fieldnotes, interview transcripts, demographic data, and other information that might reveal the location of the study or the participants’ identities.

Research practice that focuses on hiding or anonymizing data may no longer suffice in situations where social researchers need to design studies, manage data, and build research reports in increasing public, archivable, searchable, and traceable spaces.  In such research environments, there are few means of adequately disguising details about the venue and persons being studied. In decades prior to the Internet, sociologists often claimed that their research would be published in obscure journals, unlikely to catch the attention of the participants, general public or news media. The advent of the internet, the rise of citizen journalism and the possibility of global distribution of research findings has made this defense no longer viable.

One practical method of data representation in contexts where privacy protection is unstable is fabrication, which involves creative, bricolage-style transfiguration of original data into composite accounts or representational interactions. In this seminar, Annette Markham traces some of the historical trends that have restricted such creative ethical solutions; emphasizes a researcher’s obligation to protect research participants’ privacy in mediated research contexts; and discusses procedures for fabrication practices that can help maintain a researcher’s interpretive authority and credibility across various disciplinary standards.

All are welcome, with coffee or tea served to those notifying info@qumu.se of their planned attendance of one or both of the seminars.

  • Author:
  • Published: May 26th, 2011

qumu conference | 16-17 June 2011
Ethical dilemmas in qualitative research

The qumu workshop on ethical dilemmas in qualitative research is closing in. We hope that many people will attend and that we will have good discussions. The full programme is now available, and anyone wanting to take part can register for free to info@qumu.se.

  • Author:
  • Published: Apr 30th, 2011

qumu #6 2011 | May 5
Computer-assisted qualitative analysis of texts and web spheres

The sixth qumu seminar will be held in collaboration with HUMlab and will be lead by Astrid Mager who is a post-doc in the lab. Are you struggling with coding, organizing, analyzing, “taming” your research materials? Are you planning to do a qualitative analysis of text andor audio and video pieces? Have you ever wanted to know what’s lying behind your search engine results and how to analyze that? Or do you simply want to know more about all that? If your answer to one of these questions is yes then you should definitely attend this seminar.

The seminar is given in the format of a short course where tools like Atlas T.I., Google Scraper, and IssueCrawler will be used and discussed. The software Atlas T.I. helps us to do a  qualitative analysis of various texts including interview transcripts, newspaper articles, websites, or blog entries, but also audio and video materials. Digital methods such as the Google Scraper and the IssueCrawler (from the Govcom.org Foundation, Amsterdam) enable us to visualize and analyze which websites dominate search engine results in a specific issue area, which perspectives these websites have on the issue, and which underlying link networks of websites create and stabilize these results. Besides learning how to use these tools, the goal of the seminar is also to reflect on both possibilities and challenges involved in the use of computer-assisted methods and visualization techniques, the “politics of visualization”.

The course will be held in English. No preliminary knowledge required! Please register via the HUMlab system here.

Welcome!